Your In-house facility for Outsourced  
Applications Development
Qbitsystems Home Qbitsystems Contact ASK Us
Home Contact Us Ask For Quote
Offshore Software Development Company Offshore Software Development Company
QBit Systems Blogs

iPAD

July 1st, 2010

A large, high-resolution LED-backlit IPS display, an incredibly responsive Multi-Touch screen and an amazingly powerful Apple-designed chip…all in a design that’s thin and light enough to take anywhere; the iPad Tablet PC isn’t just the best device of its kind but a whole new kind of device. The all new iPad sports the look and feel of an iPhone or iPod touch, but on a larger scale. In addition to its iPhone/iPod-like user interface that ditches the common desktop UI metaphors in favor of simple application buttons, it also supports a lot of newly designed apps.

Though the makers expect that most iPhone and iPod Touch applications would work fine unmodified on the iPad, as an iPad Apps Developer Company , QbitSystems understand running every iPhone application, as it is, on the iPad may not necessarily be optimal or desirable. iPad Application Development gingers up your experience with a tablet device that should ideally be a little different than what is now supported on an iPhone application. After all, it’s worth it.

Selecting iPad Application Developers/Programmers for building creative and professional iPad Tablet Apps, iPad Apps is often like rolling the dice. You need developers adept at iPad Application Development, because for a variety of reasons, they are expected to create iPad-specific applications that aren’t intended for iPhone use. iPhone Application Development India helps you to materialize every kind of application you intend to have in your iPad Tablet PC, customized to your needs and requirements.

Our teams of developers who’ve created ingenious applications for Apple’s renowned iPhone are now poised to explore new opportunities for the new iPad Tablet. IADI’s mobile application developers use official SDK to build iPad Tablet Apps. The expertise and talent of iPad Application Developers/Programmers at IADI is something you could bank on to make successful and high quality iPad Tablet Apps. The talented minds who’ve been building for iPhone and iPod Touch till date, now stand prepared for building apps for the slender iPad Tablet PC, the device that flaunts a new form and extended UI.

The future aspects for iPad application Development at QbitSystems are Agile. We are optimizing iPhone apps for the iPad 9.7 inch screen. Plus, we develop creative new applications for the iPad. And we take advantage of the new form factor by creating more feature-rich applications like Book publishing, Maps and Navigation, Music, Business, Multimedia, Education, Entertainment, Healthcare, Lifestyle, Photography, Social networking, Travel, Weather.

Business Intelligence Best Practices: Transforming Data into Information

July 1st, 2010

Many companies today find that they are data rich and information poor. They have many transaction systems generating data, but they are unable to turn their most valuable asset, data, into actionable information. A data warehouse infrastructure can provide a company with the means to exploit their data assets. The introduction of information technology systems decades ago helped organizations worldwide benefit from more efficient operations and greater productivity. Over the years, companies have acquired volumes of data in these applications, but much of this data is trapped in multiple, disparate systems which cannot easily communicate. As a result, firms must expend considerable effort to tap into the full potential of these data assets to strategically maneuver the business in a rapidly changing and competitive marketplace.

Businesses in every industry now collect and maintain data relevant to their operation. For example, manufacturing companies collect and maintain information about inventories and production, retail shops record sales and order information, health care organizations maintain patient medical records, and publishing companies track book sales and inventories. Nonetheless, storing data is not enough! Businesses, and their management staff, must use this data to make well-informed business decisions on a regular basis. The data collected must be transformed into information, and then it must be properly organized, easily accessible, and shared among various individuals—both internal employees and external affiliates and customers. The transformation and dissemination of this data facilitates analysis that can reveal business-critical information, such as sales trends or potential inventory shortages.

When thinking about all the various sources of data within most organizations and how diverse the collection of sources can be, it quickly becomes important to consider a common toolset for accessing, analyzing, and sharing the information produced from these sources among a wide audience of organizational users. This is often where the value of spreadsheet applications diminishes and where the value of a robust reporting application begins. Most organizations want one common reporting solution that is able to work with all their data sources and support a broad base of audience-specific reporting requirements. Such standardization also facilitates the acquisition of a consistent skill set across the organization and increases the availability of expertise needed to support the organizational use of the application. Rather than having many different report file formats created from different applications, an organization that standardizes with a professional reporting solution.

The latest evolution in IT is “business intelligence,” which promises to help businesses better tap into and leverage their data assets. Rational decision making is limited by a lack of information and time, but by having knowledge and tools at hand, one can quite easily limit these bottlenecks.

Bringing Web 2.0 to the Enterprise

July 1st, 2010

Web applications have undergone significant change over the last decade; ten years ago, there were no Web-sharing sites or applications, merely sites composed of static pages or ecommerce applications. Companies that had customer-facing Web sites were able to connect with Internet-savvy consumers and use their Web sites as a channel to market and sell their products; corporate intranets were used mainly as places to post news and company policies. More recently, Web sites have become destinations for communities of users to create and share rich and complex data, such as music, images, and video, and to discuss and rate that content.

This phenomenon was dubbed “Web 2.0″ in a seminal discussion paper by Tim O’Reilly in September 2005, and it continues expanding today. In essence, Web 2.0 is the collective realization that the ability to use the Web to write as well as read rich content—combined with support for social networking and the rapid spread of broadband access—allows people to interact with the Web, with online content, and with one another. It represents a fundamental change in the way people interact with content, applications, and other users; the new Web is a platform for harnessing and promoting collective intelligence. People are no longer merely consumers of content and applications: They are participants, creating content and interacting with different services and people. More and more people are creating blogs, contributing to knowledge bases such as Wikipedia, and using peer-to-peer technologies. Sometimes referred to as the network effect, this increase in participation and content creation presents new opportunities to involve the user in deeper, more meaningful ways.

Organizations of all types and sizes from startups to Fortune 100 companies and from all industry verticals have seen the explosive growth on the Web of social and community sites in the consumer space such as MySpace, YouTube, and the deluge of Web 2.0 sites. Enterprises have witnessed the moves of major Web players such as Amazon, eBay, Live, Google, and Yahoo to include social and community elements, and the interest and demand that this has created. They are now actively investigating and in many cases building new community-based portals and businesses for their own organizations; Web 2.0 is moving into the enterprise.

Organizations are interested in using Web 2.0 techniques primarily in two areas: inside the organization to improve efficiency and productivity, and from the organization to the customers to improve revenue and customer satisfaction. The use of Web 2.0 within organizations is called Enterprise 2.0 and is likely to be the first area where Web 2.0 will be used by organizations. The use of Web 2.0 by enterprises to face their customers and consumers is similar to Business to Customer (B2C) activity but with a social and community focus so it is called Business to Community or B2C 2.0. Interest in this use of the “community as a customer” is rapidly growing.

Many business users are familiar with these technologies through personal use, they remain uncertain as to how these technologies can provide strategic benefits to their business. Indeed, according to the aim Market IQ study, “Enterprise 2.0: Agile, Emergent, and Integrated,” 2 most organizations are not incorporating Web 2.0 technologies strategically. Forty-five percent of the surveyed organizations are predominantly deploying Web 2.0 technologies in an ad hoc manner. The reason is that businesses are not entirely clear on how to incorporate these technologies into their strategic operations. With many software vendors claiming to incorporate Web 2.0 technologies into their business applications, what should an organization look for when evaluating these solutions? The majority of ERP applications today are built using decade-old client/server technology. However, only a business application built from the ground up on top of a service-oriented architecture (SOA) platform is able to seamlessly incorporate Web 2.0 capabilities into a business environment. Many vendors today are transforming existing client/server ERPs into services by creating XML wrappers around them. This enables easier application to application and B2B connectivity. However, applications built natively on top of an SOA platform benefit from a more adaptable, process-based and real – time platform that’s built for change.

The use of Web 2.0 techniques in the enterprise promises to have profound and far reaching effect on how organizations work both internally and externally, creating completely new and powerful ways of reaching, selling and supporting customers as communities.

Finally!!! Nokia Clicks Open Source

July 1st, 2010

Nokia and Intel have just announced the creation of MeeGo, a new Linux-based operating system designed for portable devices including netbooks and smartphones as well as other non-desktop platforms like connected TVs and vehicles. The new OS is a combination of Nokia’s Maemo and Intel’s Moblin, both Linux-based computing environments. This partnership is notable not just for combining two different Linux platforms under one roof, but for its cross-platform support of both Intel and ARM chips, the latter currently popular in mobile devices like Apple’s iPhone thanks to its low power consumption needs.

The MeeGo operating system is designed to let developers write once and then deploy to a number of hardware platforms including everything from smartphones to netbooks and more, a popular strategy these days in an increasingly fragmented mobile world. The same strategy has also been recently embraced by Adobe, who now lets their developers write once and then deploy their Flash apps to any operating system, both desktop and laptop-based or mobile. MeeGo is designed from the ground up to be open in every way. Combining the best of both Maemo and Moblin, and their developer communities, the new ecosystem will deliver a range of experiences for users, including internet-based, computing, communications, multitasking and multimedia. Users will be able to easily move their applications from one device to another and use the same applications on a range of different devices.

Applications that previously worked on Maemo or Moblin will work on the new MeeGo OS, too, say the companies. Also, the new platform is not intended to replace Nokia’s own Symbian OS, Nokia assures. Instead, using the Qt application and UI framework, developers can deploy apps to both MeeGo and other platforms, including Symbian. The resulting applications will then be marketed through Nokia’s Ovi Store, for all MeeGo and Symbian-based Nokia devices while Intel’s AppUp Center will handle the marketing of apps for Intel-based MeeGo devices. Very soon QbitSystems is planning to step in this open source arena like MeeGo and cross platform like RhoMobiles, as discussed they are open source and more logical to code in less weight.

Effective Application Outsourcing: The Importance of Provider / Client Relationships

July 1st, 2010

Drawn by the need to reduce costs, increase productivity, and access large pools of highly skilled resources, more and more companies are engaging global IT service providers to help them deliver critical projects and services. Yet while the advantages of global sourcing are convincing, the challenges can be equally daunting. The complexities of managing widely dispersed engagements demand a sophisticated delivery strategy – one that is based on stringent project management disciplines, yet that is flexible enough to accommodate changing business needs.

Global sourcing is an important part of many companies’ strategies as they seek to lower costs, accelerate time-to-market, and gain access to a large pool of skilled resources. Gaining these advantages, however, requires overcoming considerable risks and logistical challenges. Obstacles ranging from the complexities of managing widely dispersed teams to cultural nuances and the uncertainties of geopolitics demand considerable knowledge and experience. However, companies can capitalize on the benefits of global sourcing while minimizing its risks and challenges. Many companies have learned that global sourcing is not an all-or-nothing decision about transferring work offshore. It should be a broader strategy that blends local and offshore capabilities into a seamless delivery model managed through an onsite interface.

The success of a sourcing relationship depends upon the quality of regular interactions and communications between the company and its service provider. Local presence is essential to creating effective relationships and to meeting service level commitments. With this Global Delivery Model, a locally- based client interface ensures proper communication of requirements and issues, sets performance expectations, and handles the nuances of intercultural exchanges. Trust in the quality and responsiveness of this interface is essential if a company is to free itself from involvement in behind the scenes operational details.

Relationships in outsourcing are defined as an ongoing linkage between an outsourcing vendor and customer that has a long-term orientation. Relationships in outsourcing consequently occur with some type of exchange between the parties. Maintaining positive client-supplier relationships is central to achieving benefits from IT outsourcing. One way to create value in IT outsourcing is by building and sustaining a flexible relationship between customers and providers of IT outsourcing. Successful management of an outsourcing relationship thus requires a highly interactive and flexible relationship between two organizations to be sustained over the strategic planning horizon. As in any relationship, the interaction between client and the service provider often goes beyond the rules, agreements, and exceptions specified in a legal contract.

High-quality development and support environments that are supported by continuous process improvement initiatives ensure solid project performance and service delivery. Perhaps the most important advantage is risk management. The risks of global sourcing should never overshadow the rewards. Yet without the right combination of capabilities, processes, and accountability, the risks can usurp the cost and productivity benefits that
a typical global sourcing strategy was meant to provide. Choosing a solution that meets the critical success factors for global sourcing will ensure that any application outsourcing engagement can successfully leverage the advantages of global delivery without losing sight of the most important objective: delivering targeted projects or services with high customer satisfaction.

Adobe ships Flash 10.1 to mobile device makers

July 1st, 2010

Adobe said that Flash Player 10.1 will be available as a final production release for Android-based smartphones and tablets once users are able to upgrade to Android 2.2, dubbed “Froyo.” The mobile version of Flash was also released to platform partners to be supported on devices based on Blackberry, webOS, future versions of Windows Phone, LiMo, MeeGo and Symbian OS. The combined power of the leading rich media technology platform with millions of passionate creative is sure to impact the world in ways we haven’t even imagined yet. Android devices expected to support both Android 2.2 and Flash Player 10.1 in the near future are the Dell Streak, Google Nexus One, HTC Evo, HTC Desire, HTC Incredible, Motorola Droid, Motorola Milestone and Samsung Galaxy S. Now mobile users can browse the full Web on their smart phones, and Android developers can use industry-leading tools to create immersive experiences on the Web.

Flash looks like it had its day but it’s waning, and HTML5 looks like it’s coming up.” While Apple has banned Flash from its devices powered by the iPhone OS, including the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad, it has embraced HTML5. The exclusion of Flash has been pegged by Apple on the Web format’s alleged instability and high power consumption in mobile devices. The fight between the two companies has been a matter of considerable debate, but many major Web sites have turned to HTML5 since the release of the iPad.

In addition to banning Flash from its mobile Web browsers, Apple also changed the iPhone developer agreement to ban third-party tools that would allow software to be ported from other formats, like Adobe Flash, to native iPhone OS software. Those changes have come under federal scrutiny, as the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are considering an antitrust inquiry into the matter.

The desktop counterpart of Flash Player 10.1 for Mac shipped earlier this month after more than six months of beta testing. The plug-in works with Firefox, Opera, and Safari browsers, but it does not yet include official support for hardware video acceleration. Users who want early hardware acceleration must download Adobe’s preview release of “Gala” H.264 hardware decoding, allowing Flash videos to play more efficiently on Macs.

Top locations for offshore software development

August 20th, 2009

With the growing inclination towards offshore software development more and more regions are joining the trail with their own benefits and offerings. While some are new to the list others have well rooted themselves through years of experience. Let’s go through the popular locations to opt for offshore software development along with their strength and weaknesses.

India:
In present scenario India is the most preferred destination for offshore software development with the largest segment of outsourcing work coming its way. As the first country to land into large scale offshore outsourcing it is naturally the most experienced player. Well-developed telecommunication network; an abundant, inexpensive, qualified, skilled and English-speaking labour force and advanced technological infrastructure are the factors making it the most favorable place to seek for offshore software development. Estimations say that offshoring software development to India gives a cost saving of 40-60 per cent, quality improvement of 3-8 per cent and productivity increase of 20-150 per cent. And as a far as the skill pool is concerned the country boasts world’s top third university (Indian Institute of technology) for IT and is producing 180,000 skilled IT engineers each year.
Apart from its various advantages India is also confronting few threats. The increasing number of offshore centers and competitive skill force would lead to hike in wages in the coming future. This would ultimately cause decrease in cost margin for offshore outsourcers. Additionally some part of the infrastructure is still struggling to meet the increased offshore outsourcing demands. India is facing a major threat from China that has potential for growing itself to offer cheaper and more developed infrastructure.

China:
Although China has a promising economy and staff wages half of that in India it’s still nurturing itself in terms of offshore software development. Even after a rapidly improving infrastructure and highly skilled workforce issues such as lack of English language proficiency among the workforce and weak legal framework have dragged it down to be the second best option. Another important factor making it a less preferred than India is a wide cultural and physical gap. Despite of all this it still remains to be the offshore software development location for countries like Japan and Korea.

Eastern Europe:
Eastern European countries such as Poland, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic are sharpening their resources to prove their competence in offshore software development. These countries fall in race due to their skilled resource, favorable laws and politically stable environment. The only thing is that the business of offshore software development in these countries is small scale and unproven.

Choosing the right offshore software development model

August 17th, 2009

Picking a right service model is very essential phase of planning offshore software development. Choosing offshore software development model relates to selecting appropriate teamwork and partnership working arrangement for the project delivery. There are four standard types of offshore software development models to decide from. Each model has its own advantages and disadvantages. What one to go with depends upon factors such as difficulty level of the project, time demanded by it, level of interaction required with development team, resources and more. Below are the four offshore software development models explained along with their utility.
Onsite services model:
Under this model the offshore development team goes to client’s location for project development. This model is suitable for the cases where projects are very complex in nature and require Client Company’s input on frequent basis. It is also chosen in the cases where local production environment is an essential factor and client wants the ability to oversee day-to-day project progress first hand.
Offshore development model:
In this model an offshore development center (ODC) acts as an extension arm for project’s software engineering, maintenance and support facilities. The only project related activities that take place onsite are requirement gathering, feasibility study, implementation and support (partly). All the core development activities such as functional specification, system design, development, testing and support are performed offshore. So if you have initial planning process and critical components of project identified offshore software development model can significantly reduce the development costs by drawing on the extensive resources at ODC. Three major reasons of going for offshore development model are cost, skill and expertise.
Cost: When your allocated budget does not permit you to outsource onsite you can opt for offshore outsourcing to places with cheaper manpower and resources.
Skill: When there is shortage of skills relating to a particular field or technology onsite.
Expertise: When the required level of expertise is not to be found onshore.

Fixed Cost Development Model:
This type of setup goes well for the projects with well defined requirement and functional specification. After analyzing the project requirements the offshore software development team offers a fixed cost solution. The fixed cost is decided on the time and material basis.

Hybrid Development model:
Hybrid model combines the benefits of onsite and offshore development model and is generally suitable for lengthy projects with high level of cruciality. The projects that require high knowledge transfer and involvement of business users but need to take advantage of offshore cost and skill benefit are done under this model.

Outsourcer’s guild to ensure the performance of softwares developed offshore.

August 17th, 2009

Those who have done it in past know that UAT is something that is sole responsibility of the user and not the software developer in charge. Before you sign off user acceptance document and clear the invoice it is very important to conduct a systematic UAT on your part. This becomes even more significant in the case of offshore software development because it might not be easy to refer back to offshore company as and when you face issues. In most cases companies have in-house experts to perform UAT and some even hire UAT experts but if you cannot afford to hire an expert you might have to do it by yourself. There is nothing tricky about it as far as you do it in systematic and planned manner. UAT is basically testing a software application from non-developer/ non-technical perspective and should ideally be done by the user. It is sometimes also referred to as black box testing.
It plays a key role in offshore software development as it tests how well the software application interacts with the user and thus helps to identify whether all the specifications are exercised as expected. In offshore outsourcing you are likely to face language, cultural, perception, knowledge and/or interpretation gap between you and your offshore software development team therefore it becomes even more critical to test the application inhouse.
Although this is something you can do by yourself you need to follow proper techniques. If done in a haphazard manner it might not be fruitful at all. Following are the steps to user acceptance testing that may go by.
UAT planning:
This outlines your strategy for UAT. Here you plan start and exit based laying focus on functional specifications or expectation proposed at the start of the development. One way to go about it is you may divide the application in different functional areas and test them one by one.
Designing Test cases:
Looking at the different use case scenarios you may develop test cases for each scenario. The Use Cases created during the Requirements definition phase may be used as inputs for creating Test Cases. You must also keep in mind the types of users and various circumstances that the application must handle effectively.
Setting teams to execute the test cases
One may assign different teams to execute test cases. Each team represents respective user type or simply the usability. For example the software might be used by business administration and business customers. As both users have different level of knowledge, different roles, different circumstance, etc. it might be fit to have people from administration testing the administration module and a bunch of customers testing the customer module.
Executing test cases
Next you execute the test cases as per the steps identified in the planning stage. The user may even execute random test after this.
The last and final step is to note all the bugs, compile these and report it to the offshore software development team.

Offshore software development and software prototyping

August 13th, 2009

Its quit easy to outsource offshore when project’s specifications and use case scenario is well defined but what about instances where the client only has a general view of what is expected from the software product. Should he go for offshore software development or not? Is there any way to ensure that the product would be made as required? How can one analyze usage scenario in the absence of enough details in the case of offshore software development projects. The answer to this is software prototyping. A prototype is a working model that is functionally equivalent to a component of the product. With companies operating in wide range of technologies and industry verticals it’s not rare that they might already have past experience near client’s needs.
While finalizing deals most offshore software development companies send a mock up (prototype) to understand client requirement. The client is then allowed to interact with the prototype helping them to provide better and more complete feedback and specifications. This further avoids the mismatch and misunderstanding when each side believes the other understands what they said. No matter how experience and proficient the company is it is always the user who knows the problem domain better than anyone on the development team does. Software prototyping helps comprehending the user’s problem domain and comes out with product that has greater tangible and intangible quality.
How the process works is firstly the basic user requirements such as inputs and outputs are analyzed. The details such as advance features, tools, technology, means, etc. is avoided and more emphases is laid on usability. An initial prototype is then developed which is followed by taking user reviews and feedback generation. The initial prototype only includes the user interface. This is widely used to clarify the user expectations especially in offshore software development models. Finally using the feedback both specifications and prototype can be improved.
There are also formal prototyping methodologies that are approved by ISO 9001. One such methodology is Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM). DSDM recommends different categories of prototyping that offshore software development companies can adopt to design their effective client offer packs:
Business prototypes: These are mostly used for business process automation software. These prototypes demonstrate common business process use case. Some examples are supply chain management systems (SCM), customer relationship management (CRM) used to design and demonstrates the business processes being automated.
Usability prototypes: These are utility based prototypes that demonstrate interface design, usability, customer type, look and feel. These are mostly used for web applications and software based on common utilities.
Performance and capacity prototypes – These prototypes demonstrate factors such as transaction rates, data storage volume, response time, etc.
Capability/technique prototypes – These are used to demonstrate the concept or the development approach.